[LoganSix]

You'll need a $70 dongle, but that isn't so bad really.

And how electronics go, it will just get cheaper and cheaper.

[lawguyman]

You'll need a $70 dongle, but that isn't so bad really. I still say a ROKU is the better option for most people to get content. Direct streaming and no middle man to cause buffering issues.

You can get a Dongle for a lot less than $70. I paid $40.

What is best depends on how you want to use it. Roku may be good for some kinds of video content but is not good for using your phone to play games or give presentations.

Posted via CB10

[keypad]

Chromecast direct smartphone/Tablet streaming to TV, has now been achieved.

Now that didn't take long did it

[notfanboy]

Chromecast direct smartphone/Tablet streaming to TV, has now been achieved.

Now that didn't take long did it

That's why this is a different from Roku. It's open and extendable. Developers will dream up scenarios that even the original Chromecast designers didn't even consider.

[Tre Lawrence]

That's why this is a different from Roku. It's open and extendable. Developers will dream up scenarios that even the original Chromecast designers didn't even consider.

Good point... the expandable nature makes it that more attractive.

[kyleheney]

Chromecast direct smartphone/Tablet streaming to TV, has now been achieved.

Now that didn't take long did it

This essentially demonstrates an easier way to use DLNA, but it uses Chromecast. Really liking the simplicity of chromecast.

Google really needs to add support for BB10 so we can have Chromecast in our BB10 share menus.

Posted via CB10