Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. KQ9
    KQ9 is offline
    KQ9's Avatar
    CrackBerry Abuser

    Posts
    226 Posts
    Global Posts
    231 Global Posts
    PIN
    102307356368365267402
    Thread AuthorThread Author   #1  

    Default Blackberry QNX OS Future

    I think RIM should focus on pushing the Bold Touch out, and from there focus on making the BB OS7/6/5 work well with the tablet, and making the tablet their number 0 priority. Because essentially the QNX running the PB will eventually become the main OS the future Blackberry devices run on. So the more the tablet is successful, the brighter the future gets!

    forget torch, forget style, keep it simple and under control.
    Maybe a Curve as a lower end cheaper version of the Bold Touch would be good.
  2. SmakBerry's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius

    Posts
    1,502 Posts
    Global Posts
    1,505 Global Posts
    #2  

    Default

    Are you kidding?

    0 on the playbook and forget about other devices?
    That would not be a good move to move these devices to have no priority. Not everyone wants the bold touch... and only catering to those that do would not help the company out at all.
    Especially dropping the ball on the playbook, that would just be asking for more people to lose faith.
  3. KQ9
    KQ9 is offline
    KQ9's Avatar
    CrackBerry Abuser

    Posts
    226 Posts
    Global Posts
    231 Global Posts
    PIN
    102307356368365267402
    Thread AuthorThread Author   #3  

    Default

    Sorry I ment by 0 priority, top priority, higher than even 1 .

    The majority of Blackberry users use the Bold form factor. I think they should stick with the Bold form till the QNX is fully ready to overtake the BBOS.
  4. grahamf's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius

    Posts
    3,427 Posts
    Global Posts
    3,443 Global Posts
    #4  

    Default

    how does giving it zero priority give it more priority?
    Blackberry 10 > Windows Phone 7/8 > Blackberry 7 > iOS > Android > Symbian > WebOS > Meego
  5. Tõnis's Avatar
    Banned

    Posts
    3,088 Posts
    PIN
    32E87D6D
    #5  

    Default

    Maybe s/he means "zero in on" ...

    Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
  6. Laura Knotek's Avatar
    CrackBerry Geek

    Posts
    11,113 Posts
    Global Posts
    15,857 Global Posts
    #6  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grahamf View Post
    how does giving it zero priority give it more priority?
    Maybe the OP is a Linux user. A nice value of 0 has a higher priority than a nice value of 1. -20 is the highest niceness value.
  7. howarmat's Avatar

    Posts
    17,626 Posts
    Global Posts
    18,152 Global Posts
    PIN
    24DA0A39
    #7  

    Default

    really is this not hard to understand...

    its not RIMs #1 priority, they are saying it should be #0 priority which comes before #1
    ~Matt
    16GB PB & Rooted Nexus 4, Z10 LE
    @howarmat
    Thanked by:
    rollingrock1988 (06-20-2011) 
  8. TheScionicMan's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses

    Posts
    7,935 Posts
    #8  

    Default

    Everyone's a smartphone industry genius...

    I wish I knew how to program, cuz my Smartphone Tycoon game would #1... or #0... or something big...
    one of these days see me drivin' round town in my rock 'n' rolls Royce with the sun roof down
    my bottle of booze no summertime blues shouting loud look at me in my rock 'n ' roll voice...
  9. grahamf's Avatar
    CrackBerry Genius

    Posts
    3,427 Posts
    Global Posts
    3,443 Global Posts
    #9  

    Default

    I wish I took CIT a year before, but now I would've had a free playbook from the developer incentive.
    Blackberry 10 > Windows Phone 7/8 > Blackberry 7 > iOS > Android > Symbian > WebOS > Meego
  10. GeneKam's Avatar
    CrackBerry Abuser

    Posts
    121 Posts
    PIN
    22DDD94D
    #10  

    Default

    QNX needs to be the priority otherwise RIM is doomed.
  11. jthep's Avatar
    CrackBerry Addict

    Posts
    682 Posts
    #11  

    Default

    Owning a Playbook, I have to say I luv the QNX OS. Sure it has had its bugs, but minor for me, it runs well, the multitasking is kewl, the layout, everything about it. Although I know phones generally aren't big enough to control things using the frame of the device like you can on the PB, but I sure do look forward to see how QNX is integrated into BB's.
  12. ADFXPro777's Avatar
    CrackBerry Abuser

    Posts
    176 Posts
    Global Posts
    177 Global Posts
    #12  

    Default

    QNX has massive potential. As I have mentioned in various posts, QNX can be found in some of the most demanding environments (e.g. nuclear power plants, military tanks, jet fighters, enterprise-monitoring, etc).

    If RIM executes QNX properly on the next-generation devices, without a doubt on my mind, they will come back in force and may even heavily threaten the other companies revenue stream.
  13. Angelo_Campher's Avatar
    CrackBerry Abuser

    Posts
    438 Posts
    Global Posts
    508 Global Posts
    PIN
    To many of them
    #13  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BBFXPro777 View Post
    QNX has massive potential. As I have mentioned in various posts, QNX can be found in some of the most demanding environments (e.g. nuclear power plants, military tanks, jet fighters, enterprise-monitoring, etc).

    If RIM executes QNX properly on the next-generation devices, without a doubt on my mind, they will come back in force and may even heavily threaten the other companies revenue stream.
    Yeah, it all depends on their execution and their ability to bring an improved app ecosystem to the fore because let's face it mobile users want apps. I personally don't care to much for them apart from some decent productivity apps but I know I am in the minority here.
  14. KQ9
    KQ9 is offline
    KQ9's Avatar
    CrackBerry Abuser

    Posts
    226 Posts
    Global Posts
    231 Global Posts
    PIN
    102307356368365267402
    Thread AuthorThread Author   #14  

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hush9300 View Post
    Yeah, it all depends on their execution and their ability to bring an improved app ecosystem to the fore because let's face it mobile users want apps. I personally don't care to much for them apart from some decent productivity apps but I know I am in the minority here.
    Same here, all I want is a few productivity apps and I'm the happiest bird around! But RIM seems to be trying to push away the thought that all that Blackberry is good for is work and no fun. I think I prefer it that way, work and no fun. For fun people have many other means of access to it!

Posting Permissions