Quote:
Originally Posted by evangelist@zagg.com I have to jump in because the information here is wrong. The film that BestSkinsEver uses IS NOT the same as the PATENTED film that the invisibleSHIELD by ZAGG is made from. The film that ZAGG uses is EXCLUSIVE to ZAGG and it is illegal for anyone else to use this film to protect gadgets. The film that ZAGG uses is also the only film with Nano-Memory Technology allowing the film to "heal" itself when it takes a beating. We were also the first to offer the Lifetime Replacement Guarantee. Some of our competitors don't even have a warranty.
Anyway, these are the facts and are indisputable. If anyone has any questions about this, please email me directly at evangelist zagg.com. |
I'd hate to be a turd to you, so sorry in advance.
No product any of these sites sells, including InvisibleShield is any different. Its all this: http //solutions 3m com/wps/portal/3M/en_US/Scotchgard-PPF/Home/For_the/Consumer/Product_Info/
Put the dots in the spaces. Cant link yet...
But seriously, I work for a chain of Body Shops, and I saw this stuff and took a blank into a Gadget Guardz shop and talked to the guy and he smiled and goes "yeah, we get it on blank card stock so no one knows"
You have to have a commercial license for a buisness to buy it from 3m, but its all the same stuff. I put some on my old curve and it was awesome. Same soap/water application, same cure time, same everything.
It comes in four different thicknesses and three different texture combos. And ironically the completely smooth one was designed for glass.
If you can explain to me what Nano Memory technology is, scientifically, without using your company jargon, then I will research further. As far as I see it Nano Memory technology is exactly what the 3m paint SCOTCHGUARD paint protection film is. It was designed to be somewhat self healing so a rock would hit it, and it would stretch and distort to absorb the impact then shrink back to its original shape. Its just the nature of the film, not nano tech.
/done
Sorry, gotta be a devil's advocate when someone tries to tout that a product that is almost 150% more expensive is superior when it is really the same