Go Back   BlackBerry Forums at CrackBerry.com > BlackBerry Device Help and Discussion Forums > BlackBerry Storm 9530/9500 > Storm Rants & Raves Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 03-16-2009, 02:16 PM
Banned
Device Model: 9530 (Storm), 8330 (Curve)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neurobit View Post
We get every new phone when they are released so we can evaluate it, just like we did with the Storm.

Thanks,
Neurobit
Well, I was talking more to the OP, but since I didn't specify I guess I can't complain if you respond. But you did happened to neglect to address anything else I said in my post. I don't say that to defend RIM, as the trolls would prefer to interpret it, I say it to point out some realities of today's market.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-16-2009, 02:19 PM
limjelo's Avatar
CrackBerry Addict
Device Model: 9530 (Storm)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 903
Default

You make some great points, BigMan2. I couldn't agree with you more.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-16-2009, 02:33 PM
Neurobit's Avatar
CrackBerry User
Device Model: 9530 (Storm)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigman2 View Post
Well, I was talking more to the OP, but since I didn't specify I guess I can't complain if you respond. But you did happened to neglect to address anything else I said in my post. I don't say that to defend RIM, as the trolls would prefer to interpret it, I say it to point out some realities of today's market.

I did not neglect to address anything.

I just answered a question which I thought it was addressed to me.

The rest of your post was not questions, they were statements, so I did not felt the need to respond to unless you had asked for opinions related to them.


Neurobit
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-16-2009, 02:38 PM
Banned
Device Model: 9530 (Storm), 8330 (Curve)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neurobit View Post
I did not neglect to address anything.

I just answered a question which I thought it was addressed to me.

The rest of your post was not questions, they were statements, so I did not felt the need to respond to unless you had asked for opinions related to them.


Neurobit
Fair enough... But based on what you said in your first post to this discussion, I would actually be interested in hearing your take on the rest of my first post in this discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-16-2009, 03:11 PM
Neurobit's Avatar
CrackBerry User
Device Model: 9530 (Storm)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigman2 View Post
Fair enough... But based on what you said in your first post to this discussion, I would actually be interested in hearing your take on the rest of my first post in this discussion.
BigMan2,

I know that marked conditions have changed since 1999, but certain things never change, like the shelf life of a cell phone or any other consumer electronics (competition has been fierce all along IMO).

I do agree with your point, but it is not a new phenomenon, and companies need to adapt or face being replaced by somebody else that will offer the features and value that may be lacking in a particular product.

RIM seems to have their act together and has done a great job of putting out great smart phones. In fact, up until the Storm, every Blackberry I ever got has always been better then the one I had before in terms of features, ergonomics, functionality, etc, so like many other people at CB, I was shocked to find a product that did not follow that trend (read Storm).

Not bashing RIM, just making the observation that the Storm is not a phone I want anywhere near my end users as a business tool, and that's why we are sticking with other models that are tried and true and live up to the Blackberry name.

Will the Storm ever be the phone I want it to be? Only time will tell, but unfortunately there isn't that much time left

Neurobit
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-16-2009, 03:51 PM
Banned
Device Model: 9530 (Storm), 8330 (Curve)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neurobit View Post
BigMan2,

I know that marked conditions have changed since 1999, but certain things never change, like the shelf life of a cell phone or any other consumer electronics (competition has been fierce all along IMO).

I do agree with your point, but it is not a new phenomenon, and companies need to adapt or face being replaced by somebody else that will offer the features and value that may be lacking in a particular product.

RIM seems to have their act together and has done a great job of putting out great smart phones. In fact, up until the Storm, every Blackberry I ever got has always been better then the one I had before in terms of features, ergonomics, functionality, etc, so like many other people at CB, I was shocked to find a product that did not follow that trend (read Storm).

Not bashing RIM, just making the observation that the Storm is not a phone I want anywhere near my end users as a business tool, and that's why we are sticking with other models that are tried and true and live up to the Blackberry name.

Will the Storm ever be the phone I want it to be? Only time will tell, but unfortunately there isn't that much time left

Neurobit
Not sure I agree with everything, but I appreciate the time you took to respond.

The Storm is kind of a different beast from most BBs. It's the first serious push into the consumer territory. It won't appeal to people who are looking for a traditional BB. Which isn't good or bad IMO, it just is one of those things that simply is. Time will tell whether this ends up working out for them or not. So far, sales figures seem to point to yes, but anyone can come up with something of a one hit wonder.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-16-2009, 04:06 PM
Neurobit's Avatar
CrackBerry User
Device Model: 9530 (Storm)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigman2 View Post
Not sure I agree with everything, but I appreciate the time you took to respond.

The Storm is kind of a different beast from most BBs. It's the first serious push into the consumer territory. It won't appeal to people who are looking for a traditional BB. Which isn't good or bad IMO, it just is one of those things that simply is. Time will tell whether this ends up working out for them or not. So far, sales figures seem to point to yes, but anyone can come up with something of a one hit wonder.
My pleasure, and I do agree with you on this last posting.
Only time will tell whether it's a winner for them or not, I guess we'll have to wait and see.

Thanks for your response,
Neurobit
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-16-2009, 04:30 PM
CrackBerry Abuser
Device Model: 9530/iPhone 3G
Carrier: Verizon, AT&T
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigman2 View Post
Competition has gotten increasingly fierce, and the shelf-life of the average cell phone is 6 months, if that. A phone has a maximum of 6 months to "make it" before something new comes out. If it hasn't "made it" by then, it will fall to the wayside and be forgotten.
Ah, the Storm's Swan Song is only two months away.

RIP
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-16-2009, 04:47 PM
RCCollins's Avatar
CrackBerry Abuser
Device Model: JankBerry9530 (Storm)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilbrnr View Post
Ah, the Storm's Swan Song is only two months away.

RIP

No doubt, no software update can save this turd.

Last edited by RCCollins; 03-16-2009 at 04:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-16-2009, 04:47 PM
xxxxpradaxxxx's Avatar
CrackBerry Genius
Device Model: 9700/9550/8900/8520/DROID/3GS
Carrier: AT&T/Verizon/Tmobile/Sprint
PIN: la queue sur l'âne
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Short Hills, NJ
Posts: 1,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by limjelo View Post
BTW, I've probably done 2 or 3 battery pulls in 5+ months of ownership. Use Quickpull scheduler nightly and everything is good to go.
WhatAre You Smoking?

ANY and EVERY BlackBerry Should Get Regular Battery Pulls.

Albeit not Daily, but in Moderation.

So 2 or 3 in 5+ Months?

Sounds like a Blatant Lie.

Quickpull Doesn't Fully Replace a Battery Pull.

Try Again.
__________________
"Why is a Raven like a Writing Desk?"
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-16-2009, 04:51 PM
CrackBerry Newbie
Device Model: 8330 (Curve)
Carrier: Verizon
PIN: 31F09508
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1
Default Not a practical phone

I bought the Storm and returned it in 2 days because it is not made for fast communication. As cool at the touch screen is, it is too difficult to use the keyboard and send messages fast.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-16-2009, 05:10 PM
Banned
Device Model: 9530 (Storm), 8330 (Curve)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilbrnr View Post
Ah, the Storm's Swan Song is only two months away.

RIP
No... I think ultimately the Storm will go down as a success as far as RIM is concerned. Sales have been much stronger than anticipated, and much higher than is RIM's norm. Whether or not it succeeds in paving the way for future devices to push further into consumer territory has yet to be seen.

If you just look at the tiny little microcosm that is Crackberry, where the more obsessive users congregate, you'd think the Storm is a gigantic failure... But sales have been strong, returns low, and that says that the majority of people buying it are happy (enough) with it. But out of the just 1 million+ units sold in the US alone... How many of those people post here? We're probably talking about less than 0.1% of the total Storm owner population. And to add the rotten cherry on top of this particular bullshite sunday, people have a much greater propensity to complain than to come along and say, "Hey, everything's working great!"

It's really a shame some people have to be pricks about things. I mean, I don't fully agree with Neurobit, but we were able to have a cordial conversation. The Storm doesnt' work for him, and he listed his grievances in a non-whining way full of incoherent emotional outbursts and egotistical comments claiming to know what RIM needs to do. It's a sad statement that so many people seem to lack the emotional maturity to follow this example.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-16-2009, 05:23 PM
BzB BzB is offline
CrackBerry Addict
Device Model: Droid, Tour
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 995
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neurobit View Post
We get every new phone when they are released so we can evaluate it, just like we did with the Storm.

Thanks,
Neurobit
that's not really a good IT practice. not only is it an expensive course of action (as it usually requires switching carriers) but it's also bad asset management.

in general, the only reason to field test a device is if looking to change platforms or sun-setting older equipment. in those cases smart money isn't on early adopters, but to avoid risk you would test a device that's been on the market for more than a few months. this is why most IT policies limit the devices that are distributed and supported. my company still doesn't have the iphone as an officially supported mobile device primarily because of the issues it had with exchange integration early on and then because of the security concern. hasn't stopped a few people from getting it, but if they have problems they're on their own. lol.

personally, i don't think the storm will make much headway into corporate environments even after the gold code is released as an official os and the storm is regarded as "stable". touchscreen only devices just aren't efficient enough for the majority of the workforce, plus they're much more delicate than their buttoned counterparts.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-16-2009, 06:08 PM
Neurobit's Avatar
CrackBerry User
Device Model: 9530 (Storm)
Carrier: Verizon
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BzB View Post
that's not really a good IT practice. not only is it an expensive course of action (as it usually requires switching carriers) but it's also bad asset management.

in general, the only reason to field test a device is if looking to change platforms or sun-setting older equipment. in those cases smart money isn't on early adopters, but to avoid risk you would test a device that's been on the market for more than a few months. this is why most IT policies limit the devices that are distributed and supported. my company still doesn't have the iphone as an officially supported mobile device primarily because of the issues it had with exchange integration early on and then because of the security concern. hasn't stopped a few people from getting it, but if they have problems they're on their own. lol.

personally, i don't think the storm will make much headway into corporate environments even after the gold code is released as an official os and the storm is regarded as "stable". touchscreen only devices just aren't efficient enough for the majority of the workforce, plus they're much more delicate than their buttoned counterparts.

Perhaps I did not make myself clear, but thought that it was a given, so let me explain further

We don't evaluate every Blackberry from every provider, just the ones from our current ones (Verizon and Sprint/Nextel). Why would I want to test phones from providers that I don't use?

This not bad IT asset management, but quite the contrary.
By spending a couple of hundred dollars on a single phone, I have actually saved thousands (had I not tested this device and started ordering left and right for folks that were due for a new phone and wanted a Storm, I would have been stuck with a whole bunch of them, not just one).

We did the same with the Nextel Curve 8350i PTT, that was also released in December. We put it through the paces and guess what, this has been a great device, and we've already purchased about thirty of those and more on the way.

Neurobit
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-16-2009, 10:24 PM
CrackBerry Abuser
Device Model: 9630 Tour
Carrier: Verizon
PIN: Scan my Avatar!
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Devlyn16 View Post
Some are Former BB users.
Some are coming Other "Brand Name" smart phones (Palm, Win-mo ETC).
Some are coming from "Almost" Smart Phones (LG EnV ETC).
SOme are coming from Dumb Phones.

What you think and what you expect is based on what you had before.
And most of the time when people say they have zero issues OR love their Storm no matter what.. are from these categories...

Quote:
Some are coming Other "Brand Name" smart phones (Palm, Win-mo ETC).
Some are coming from "Almost" Smart Phones (LG EnV ETC).
SOme are coming from Dumb Phones.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 PM.

 
 Site Support | Accessory Order Support | App Store Support | Advertise | Newsletter | About Us

Creating smartphone communities
Android Central - Android reviews, news and forums Crackberry - Blackberry news, reviews and community TiPb - iPhone news, accessory reviews & forums
Pre Central - Palm Pre Review, News and Community Treo Central - Treo & Centro News and Forums WMExperts - Windows Mobile Reviews & News

The names RIM and BlackBerry are registered Trademarks of Research in Motion Limited.
CrackBerry.com is in No Way Affiliated with Research in Motion Limited.
Copyright ©2007-2009 Smartphone Experts. Terms and Conditions. Privacy Policy. All rights reserved.