[UnlimitedEra]

Not really a big fan if GSMArena but I guess they made a fair rating/comparison between both devices. Though the S4 Active has a 1.9Ghz Quad core processor, the Z10's Dual 1.5Ghz core processor beats the S4 Active at a 7.6/10 score while the S4 Active is at 6.4/10.
The blackberry Z10 did not only beat the S4 Active in performance, but it did in everything else! Including Popularity, design and features!

Blackberry Z10:
Link:BlackBerry Z10 - Full phone specifications
Popularity 24%
Design 7.6
Features 7.5
Performance 7.6

Samsung Galaxy S4 Active:
Link: Samsung I9295 Galaxy S4 Active - Full phone specifications
Popularity 4.7%
Design 6.0 ( I personally think it's ugly)
Features 6.4
Performance 6.4

Posted via CB10

[Stwutter]

Nice - but popularity? Not based on sales, I assume?

[Dirtymike14]

Try dunking the two in water a d see who wins...

Posted via CB10

[FrankIAm]

What about the normal S4?

[UnlimitedEra]

Nice - but popularity? Not based on sales, I assume?

I guess it's based on sales or surveys

Posted via CB10

[Stwutter]

I guess it's based on sales or surveys

Posted via CB10

Hmm. Maybe, but the Z10 outselling anything seems unlikely.

Posted via CB10

[UnlimitedEra]

Hmm. Maybe, but the Z10 outselling anything seems unlikely.

Posted via CB10

It surely did outsell some devices. Nothing doesn't, except the Wii-U

Posted via CB10

[Dirtymike14]

Hmm. Maybe, but the Z10 outselling anything seems unlikely.

Posted via CB10

I don't know about that, I don't think the s4 active did that well, personally I haven't seen a single one other than in a demo in a store. I don't have the actual sales figures on it though, so don't quote me on it

Posted via CB10

[kr007]

The really terrible thing about gsmarena is the completely idiotic comments that are left. It makes me fume every time I read one!

Gsmarena does cracking reviews and I do like the site but they should employ an ***** filter in order to leave a comment in my humble view.



Posted via CB10

[kr007]

Don't know why they **** my comment above...it only said '***** filter'....but maybe I'm the *****!!

Posted via CB10

[kr007]

Wtf??!!... I d i o t is an offensive word?

Posted via CB10

[SUBLIMINALLYINCORRECT]

I wouldn't trust any scoring in gsm arena. A lot of paid shills and angry fan boys come in to skew the scoring. I mean just look at the galaxy s5 scoring.

Posted via CB10

[dustmalik]

Don't know why they **** my comment above...it only said '***** filter'....but maybe I'm the *****!!

Posted via CB10

Hahaha. I just had to laugh because I couldn't even make sense of your comment due to filtering.

Posted via CB10 using my Gorgeous Z10

[UnlimitedEra]

I wouldn't trust any scoring in gsm arena. A lot of paid shills and angry fan boys come in to skew the scoring. I mean just look at the galaxy s5 scoring.

Posted via CB10

The only thing I hate about Samsung is the lag issues, once you load it up with 20-30 apps, it goes extremely laggy, it's not android, it's the phone it self I also hate sh*t ton of apps that comes with it, Samsung store, svoice splay blablabla, they alone make the phone laggy like hell, not to mention their 6 months strategy then care less about the older devices. That's why I'm not surprised with their s5 rating.

Posted via CB10

[kr007]

Apparently the word 'I d i o t' is an illegal word here?! Thank f u c k I didn't use any profanities!!

Posted via CB10

[kr007]

I'm off to read the crackberry rules, but maybe I'm the f u c k I n g I d i o t after all?! Sorry if I've offended anyone, groan.

Posted via CB10

[FrankIAm]

I'm off to read the crackberry rules, but maybe I'm the f u c k I n g I d i o t after all?! Sorry if I've offended anyone, groan.

Posted via CB10

Do you want a ban? 'cause that's how you get a ban.

[kr007]

Do you want a ban? 'cause that's how you get a ban.

Sorry if it's illegal !

If it is i'll ban myself, didn't think these enlightened forums where so sensitive

Posted via CB10

[Dirtymike14]

Do you want a ban? 'cause that's how you get a ban.

Technically he didn't swear, otherwise he it would have got blocked

Posted via CB10

[Raestloz]

Technically he didn't swear, otherwise he it would have got blocked

Posted via CB10

Circumventing word filters is an offense. Well, normally anyway. Especially in a way that doesn't even hide the word in question. Using asterisks is usually okay (like no s***), which can either be a soup or an excrement. Now I bet you're thinking of a soup of excrement. You're welcome

Z10 STL100-1/10.2.1.2141

[kr007]

APOLOGY FROM ME!

Hands up, I'm sorry if I have offended any fellow CB readers by my above profanities.

I will blame it partly on the enormous amount of beer I had last night!

It won't happen again and please forgive me...I hope.



Posted via CB10

[Dirtymike14]

Circumventing word filters is an offense. Well, normally anyway. Especially in a way that doesn't even hide the word in question. Using asterisks is usually okay (like no s***), which can either be a soup or an excrement. Now I bet you're thinking of a soup of excrement. You're welcome

Z10 STL100-1/10.2.1.2141

Kind of more of a legal loophole. TECHNICALLY You could read it as "eff you see Kay eye en gee eye dee eye oh tee" but Ya I get what you mean. And yes, I did picture s*** soup

Posted via CB10