Q10 screen quality, the new EDOF "scandal"?
There are a few problems with the Q10's OLED screen.
- Colours are over-saturated. It just looks weird, particularly the blue of the OS and reds/oranges.
- The screen has a blue/green colouration as soon as you're not exactly in front of the device
- The screen is very difficult to read outside on a sunny day, especially when using the default dark theme (which is the only way to save a bit of battery life)
Most of these effects are inherent to the technology used, but it's possible to minimise them and you have to put the pros in the balance to decide if it's worth it.
Is the alleged battery saving, which only occurs if you're always using dark colours in your apps, really worth the trade-offs?
Did BlackBerry pick a cheaper display to cut costs (since we know that today's amoled screens can be much better (Galaxy S4))?
I suspect that, just like with BB's choice to downgrade the 9900's camera by removing autofocus, this will divide the community. Some will say it doesn't matter and that's the price you have to pay for a phone that can last all day while some will find it strange that BlackBerry went for a cheaper looking display compared to what's available on other platforms.
What are your thoughts on the new screen?
Last edited by ofutur; 05-07-2013 at 11:07 AM.
- 04-25-2013, 10:01 AM #2
I find it weird that the screen is supposedly cheaper.
The trackpad isn't on it.
The charging contacts on the bottom have been dropped, the only possible reason would be for cost purposes.
So many things dropped, yet it's still launching at crazy expensive.
Makes no sense.
- CrackBerry Abuser
04-25-2013, 11:02 AM #3
- 134 Posts
The trackpad was not dropped to save cost. It was a design choice for how to use the OS.
Have you seen the display? No reviews have complained of bad colour temperature or oversaturated colours. The colours are more vibrant, the white isn't as strong and if you view the screen off angle it gets bluer - this is what I've read in reviews. No one has complained about the screen looking cheap. What does it matter if the screen get's bluer for high viewing angles? Who views their phone at an off angle?
I've seen at least one review complain about the colours and I agree with the reviewer. It does look weird, not just "more vibrant". Maybe that can be changed in software.
Regarding the blue tint, it's not just from a high viewing angle, just tilt the phone slightly and it's there. It gets worse as the angle gets higher. Let's say you have your phone on your desk, the hub is much more readable on a Z10 than it is on a Q10.
- 04-25-2013, 11:22 AM #7
The problem is color calibration is that each user has his/her own eyes. When I got my MacBook Air, I couldn't stand the factory calibration. I had heck hecks and almost nausea. I picked a very blueish calibration that matches perfectly my eyes/brain/whatever.
So a particular user cannot judge if a screen is good for the rest of the people.
I think I read the same statement for the Galaxy S3, which has still 50 millions buyers across the globe.
- CrackBerry Abuser
04-25-2013, 11:26 AM #8
- 209 Posts
I've been waiting for this phone for years! Now it's looking like it's the BB10 version of Os 6 phone. Things changed for an orphan phone. They are changing the screen on the next phones. So it looks like Q10 is just a stop gap till BB gets the' real 'keyboard phones they planned in production. Another year waiting
Posted via Z10
- 04-25-2013, 11:38 AM #9
Saturation came out of the lamentable BGR review. It's a comic masterpiece with Geller pining for old BB's he obviously never used and no doubt trashed back when.
The price of the Q10 and the design decisions have me once again rethinking. For me, it will be a hands-on decision to see just how much progress I?ve made with the Z10 keyboard and how well the Q10 recaptures the sublime 9900 keyboard experience.Z10, 10.0.10.684 -- Playbook 64gb, 18.104.22.1682 and Surface Pro 128
- CrackBerry User
04-25-2013, 11:38 AM #10
- 69 Posts
I wonder if this has anything to do with blue being an issue on OLED screens still. Basically the OLED material used to create blue degrades faster than other colours and this creates colour balance issues over time. To combat this, some manufacturers may begin the lifespan of their OLED screens with an over saturated or deeper blue.
Posted via CB10
- CrackBerry Genius
04-25-2013, 11:56 AM #12Thank You Crackberry!
- 1,528 Posts
Check out my BlackBerry/QNX/Crackberry Wallpapers!
Made for PB/Z10/Q10/Q5
- 04-25-2013, 12:31 PM #13
- CrackBerry Addict
04-25-2013, 12:35 PM #14
- 719 Posts
Wait until demo models become available and make the determination for yourself. Reading a biased review by a biased person/organization and using the pictures they posted as gospel is ridiculous.
Until you hold a final version of the phone in your hand and see for yourself, you will never know for sure.
JBIf I've helped you or given you a healthy dose of reality, click the Like or Thanks button
Regarding the Galaxy line, there is a good analysis of the screen used here and how it compares to a good LCD:
Galaxy S4 Display Technology Shoot-Out
Seems like the S4 has fixed quite a few of the issues, but some like the colour shift do reside. Maybe BlackBerry is using last year's technology and as someone's mentioned, we'll get the good stuff next year.
I'll have to go check out a S4 to see the difference.
Regarding the power savings, it seems like it could be worth it if sticking to the dark theme. "Normal" pictures seem to consume about the same as a LCD while something like the Hub at max brightness would consume about twice as much .
- CrackBerry Genius
04-25-2013, 12:47 PM #16
- 3,418 Posts
Given the number of areas where they could have easily shaved some money from the overall cost e.g. dropping the metal band, going with the same back as a z10 amongst others it is simply laughable that anyone would think they had gone for a cheapy display as if that had been their aim then they could have skipped oled entirely and just stuck with lcd.
- 04-25-2013, 01:04 PM #17
- CrackBerry User
04-25-2013, 01:32 PM #19
- 72 Posts
BGR...that is all you need to know. I find it hard to read (actually I no longer do) a review from such biased individuals. Everything does not need to be compared to Apple. Of course Crackberry is biased...its a Blackberry site and we all know their tendencies. The Globe and Mail, Mobile Syrup....those reviews seem much more balanced.
Sent from my BlackBerry 9900 using Tapatalk
- 04-25-2013, 02:58 PM #20
Considering that the Q10 screen uses a PenTile Matrix, it's one of the best available.
Posted via CB10Posted from my awesome QNX powered Q10 or my penguin powered laptop
My Channel: Geeks United C00122408
Yep and people who don't want to go through the whole S4 SuperAMOLED screen analysis, check out the summary on Ars as well.
Three years in, AMOLED displays are finally getting it right | Ars Technica
Here is what they say about OLED screens:
"These screens cost less to manufacture but can have issues with color accuracy and text crispness"
So it seems BB was definitely looking to cut costs there, especially if the screen is not as good as what's on the S4, being released at the exact same time.
EDIT: The Ars review also mentions over-saturation and the hue
"most colors are more vibrant (if sometimes a little too saturated) and blacks are blacker, but the screen can take on a greenish or purplish hue if viewed from an angle"
- By unknown7 in forum Storm OS DiscussionReplies: 13Last Post: 06-05-2009, 01:15 AM
- By unknown7 in forum BlackBerry StormReplies: 4Last Post: 06-04-2009, 08:05 PM
- By njdvlsfan in forum Storm OS DiscussionReplies: 9Last Post: 05-24-2009, 03:09 AM
- By jetman1287 in forum BlackBerry StormReplies: 2Last Post: 01-30-2009, 11:55 AM
- By asylvia in forum BlackBerry StormReplies: 8Last Post: 12-11-2008, 04:07 PM