- 03-08-2012, 12:11 PM
Thread Author #1
PlayBook Retina Display
All this iPad "retina display" is getting out of hand. Is it me or can the PlayBook also be considered a "retina display" perse. The Playbook has 167ppi and it is 1/2 the screen real estate as "The New iPad" which has 264ppi. Cook and his Cook kluts klan claim that with their retina display you wont be able to see the individual pixels because it has more pixels than a traditional 1080p TV, TRUE. But, I am not able to see the individual pixels on my 1080p TV when watching a BD or playing a PS3 game (and the screen is 40").
Could it be that I am just mad that I have to wait a bit more for the next Gen PlayBook? lolLast edited by Abrante; 03-08-2012 at 12:17 PM.
- 03-08-2012, 12:13 PM #2
PPI is a standardized measure that takes the diagonal size into account already And no, PBs screen can't be considered "retina".
- 03-08-2012, 12:14 PM
Thread Author #3
- 03-08-2012, 12:16 PM #4
Actually, it looks like the only group of people who don't care about resolution increases are BB owners most of whom are stuck with 640x320 screens. Or they are taking it as a trade off for many great features of BB phones.
- 03-08-2012, 12:21 PM #7
- 03-08-2012, 12:21 PM #8
so the ipad is just a toy right? no one could ever use it as a tool?
- 03-08-2012, 12:23 PM
Thread Author #9
- 03-08-2012, 12:24 PM #10
- 03-08-2012, 12:30 PM #12
You should see the screen on my Samsung phone. It's so damn crisp compared to my previous phone's display. It is also more suitable for web browsing, reading, and document editing than that pathetic resolution screen I had before. And it's only 800x480 (yeah, with 1280x720 becoming a new norm, it's not super).
And no, Samsung never advertised the screen as retina, but I still can see the difference. Huge difference. - 03-08-2012, 12:32 PM
Thread Author #13
- 03-08-2012, 12:35 PM #14
- 03-08-2012, 12:38 PM #16
The PB hardware as is has a pixel density of 170, which is more than enough. That's all that really matters....
My website http://papped.webatu.com - 03-08-2012, 12:38 PM #17
Here is my understanding:
The term retina display was coined by Apple. It's the pixels per inch required for the pixels to be indistinguishable from a given viewing distance. I suppose the term is just marketing but the standard was defined by the company doing the marketing. The iphone needs more ppi to qualify as retina then does the ipad. There reasoning is the ipad is held further away.
My question is:
If my human eye can't distinguish between pixels at the distance I'm holding any screen does that make it retina?
In any case I'm sure the screen looks great. - 03-08-2012, 12:39 PM #18
- 03-08-2012, 12:43 PM #20
The PlayBook's display does out spec the iPad 2 in terms of pixel density and compares favorably to the iPad3. What the PlayBook has going for it is portability. The iPad was originally intended as a couch surfing device, not a mobile one. So far the PlayBook is the best portable device out there. No absurd nit picking over millimeters and grams is necessary. I hope BB APP WORLD is able to get apps that show off the PlayBook's excellent photo and video capabilities in all there glory. The PlayBook's photo and video capabilities combined with it's class leading display are the main reasons I bought it after extensive research. Rob Galbraith has a good article on DPI www.robgalbraith.com
- 03-08-2012, 12:45 PM #22One tool for mobile success, Blackberry Playbook + Blackberry Z10 = Mobile Success!

- 03-08-2012, 12:48 PM #24
Again the same "compare favorably" argument. No, it doesn't even compare. It's 64% of the pixel density on the iPad. It's like saying Escalade compares favorably to Honda Accord in fuel consumption.
- 03-08-2012, 12:50 PM #25

Reply















