i thought it was supposed to be true multitasking?
- The tech sites hate it b/c it's not a copy of an iPad or an Android tablet, which means they a) can't compare on specs alone and b) might have to use it/ think about it before reviewing.
It's a little different UI, different multitasking model, has bridge vs. native, 7" not 10", etc. Every tech site out there was bashing the iPad when it was introduced as well. Before they used it, of course. The PB is just a way of Thinking Different.
I'm tellin' ya too. I always had an iPad and liked it, but iCan't put this PB down at the moment. This thing rocks.Nope. They hate it because it doesn't much content and lacks native email and calendar. Nothing to do with hardware or software differences, for the average user it doesn't bring anything different and new than using an iPad (Bridge is only for BB users, not the average user). iPad was first to market, so any competitive tablet needs to bring something new to the table, e.g. Amazon Fire. Otherwise you're a me-too, or worse. I don't buy the excuse that the liberal media did not fairly review the PB, that's bull.
Consumer reports actually got it somewhat right by not comparing them at all - they were put in two different categories - 10 inch tabs and 7 inch tabs.
.Last edited by blackjack93117; 11-26-11 at 07:13 PM.
Serkle K likes this.11-26-11 07:10 PMLike 1 - You're both right - they are two different devices with two different types of users. The only thing they have in common is they are both flat and have a touchscreen, really. Not comparable at all. Like comparing apples to blackberrys.
Consumer reports actually got it somewhat right by not comparing them at all - they were put in two different categories - 10 inch tabs and 7 inch tabs.
.
Yes, but js8229 seems to be more correct. Look at this:
Best 7-inch tablets - CNET Reviews
This is ridiculous. They seem to be singling out the Playbook because it's the only powerful tablet and the only decent choice among 7-inchers. Who would want more competition? It's easier to pay CNet I guess.11-26-11 08:22 PMLike 0 - Yes, but js8229 seems to be more correct. Look at this:
Best 7-inch tablets - CNET Reviews
This is ridiculous. They seem to be singling out the Playbook because it's the only powerful tablet and the only decent choice among 7-inchers. Who would want more competition? It's easier to pay CNet I guess.
One of the 7 inch tabs is conspicuously missing?
Playbook is feared in the industry - big time. Let's not let people know the truth.HighlandBerry likes this.11-26-11 08:28 PMLike 1 -
- I believe one is only able to use the "thanks" button a limited number of times in a 24-hr period. http://forums.crackberry.com/site-qu...n-gone-602365/11-26-11 09:28 PMLike 0
-
- The tech sites hate it b/c it's not a copy of an iPad or an Android tablet, which means they a) can't compare on specs alone and b) might have to use it/ think about it before reviewing.
It's a little different UI, different multitasking model, has bridge vs. native, 7" not 10", etc. Every tech site out there was bashing the iPad when it was introduced as well. Before they used it, of course. The PB is just a way of Thinking Different.
I'm tellin' ya too. I always had an iPad and liked it, but iCan't put this PB down at the moment. This thing rocks.11-26-11 10:12 PMLike 0 - Nope. They hate it because it doesn't much content and lacks native email and calendar. Nothing to do with hardware or software differences, for the average user it doesn't bring anything different and new than using an iPad (Bridge is only for BB users, not the average user). iPad was first to market, so any competitive tablet needs to bring something new to the table, e.g. Amazon Fire. Otherwise you're a me-too, or worse. I don't buy the excuse that the liberal media did not fairly review the PB, that's bull.
RIM11-26-11 10:25 PMLike 0
- Forum
- BlackBerry PlayBook Forums
- BlackBerry PlayBook
i thought it was supposed to be true multitasking?
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD