laaame i own quicklaunch and love it, wouldnt trade it for the cheaper price Cheetah has reasonable support and has been around forever so +1 to quicklaunch
Lol, swoosh...
Personally, with the exception of phonetweak, I've found better options than any of their apps.
Get two of their apps, and tell me what you notice about the registration codes.
That's all I have to say on that
While I personally do not have quicklaunch, from what I've heard superlaunch lacks several vital aspects in comparison. Quicklaunch will win out.
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com
Well testing both apps only thing SuperLaunch takes the blue ribbon for is better looking icon..yes it resembles QL but hey its much more robust looking.
QL may want to improve that minor detail and better app even more to keep competition in pace
If it has stable OS with real browser count me in I'm buying
Sling, I always said you think "out the box".
Hey, we all love QL. It is a shame that this developer could not come up with a different format. But, I do like competition.
As was stated previously... This could be the drive for Nikkisoft to make their app much more feature rich to knock these guys out of the playing field. Better for all end users.
Honestly, who cares. Neither app is paying you nor is the existence of another
like kind app costing you a dime.
I use QuickLaunch and personally could not care less if there were a dozen apps that
did exactly the same thing. And none of these developers have exactly clean hands.
Honestly, who cares. Neither app is paying you nor is the existence of another
like kind app costing you a dime.
I use QuickLaunch and personally could not care less if there were a dozen apps that
did exactly the same thing. And none of these developers have exactly clean hands.
Because sometimes, we appreciate a well developed app, by someone who backs their product, and at the same time sells if for a good price.
It's how it should be. Good products and companies receive customer loyalty and support for being treated fairly.
When someone basically rips off another app, its not competition. And when others (new bb owners) are confused due to the name and its similar look, well, the original app owner doesn't make as much, which then makes it less likely more updates will be created.
Did I mention i just dont like other riding others coat tails?
Berryfit, I get your point but mine remains the same.
Also, ShortCutMe, LaunchPad, QL, IntelliLaunch have all "borrowed" from each other
from time to time and that has not stifled competition. People will simply use what
(A) works for them and (B) they like. QL wins that battle so I really don't see why
any of this even matters. Then again I have zero loyalty to most developers.
"Borrowing" happens across the entire app spectrum. Are we going to go on a
witch hunt against them too. This is just senseless in my view.
Peekawho was king pop up alert app once upon a time..support was basic ok then Bellshare came along with Berrypop.
Berrypop was exact same kind of app and the loyal peekawho users cried foul.
Bellshare now provides the better app with lower price , superior support & timely updates.
Competition = Good.
Superlaunch may crash..who knows but I do know this , QL is getting positive attention from SL hitting the spotlight and will make more $$ from it.
If Superlaunch steps up good for them time for app smackdown users win even more