Newest Official Bold 9000 Rogers OS v184.108.40.2062 (Multilanguage)
Software For BlackBerry® Bold (TM) 9000 smartphone
BlackBerry Handheld Software v220.127.116.115 (Multilanguage)
Package Version: 18.104.22.1685
* Applications: 22.214.171.1242
* Software Platform: 126.96.36.199
* File name: 9000M_PBr5.0.0_rel1385_PL188.8.131.52_A184.108.40.2062_Roger s_Wireless_Inc.exe
* File size: 125.59MB
- 08-24-2010, 09:39 AM #3
Interesting. Knowing Rogers, they probably put this out because it will be the LAST OS 5.0 build for the Bold 9000. I wonder if the sound profile bugs are still in there? I will give this build one more chance, now that it official.BlackBerry Z10 (10.2.1.2141), BlackBerry PlayBook 64GB Wi-Fi (220.127.116.113), Microsoft Surface 2 (Windows 8.1 RT)
- 08-24-2010, 10:33 AM #5
I had problems with the leaked version of .822. My sound profiles wouldn't work after a while. I went back to .681. I will give the official Rogers .822 version a try (since I am on Rogers) and see if it works and report back.BlackBerry Z10 (10.2.1.2141), BlackBerry PlayBook 64GB Wi-Fi (18.104.22.1683), Microsoft Surface 2 (Windows 8.1 RT)
- CrackBerry Genius of Geniuses
08-24-2010, 11:44 AM #6
- 11,423 Posts
- CrackBerry User
08-25-2010, 08:01 AM #13
- 42 Posts
So consensus is that it is still the same with the sound profiles not working?
Also, I think I am going to download the AT&T version and the Hutchinson versions install/expand them and do a MD5 hash to see if anything is different program wise.
This seems like a dumb build to release for the Bold 9000 if indeed nothing was done to stem to the sound profiles issue.
- 08-25-2010, 08:04 AM #14
Well, it has been a day and my sound profiles are still working. Will monitor the situation and report. Memory is holding up quite nicely, better than .681.BlackBerry Z10 (10.2.1.2141), BlackBerry PlayBook 64GB Wi-Fi (22.214.171.1243), Microsoft Surface 2 (Windows 8.1 RT)
- 08-25-2010, 09:55 AM #16
The sound profiles seem to be working for me with the official release versus the leak. Since I am on Rogers, this time I did not delete the vendor file and installed in through BlackBerry Desktop 6. I don't know if this somehow makes a difference. So far, so good. I will watch for the sound profile issue.
- 08-27-2010, 09:31 AM #17
Well, it has been a few days and there is no problem with the sound profiles on this build (yet) versus the leaked .822 that I tried before. Strange, the only difference was that I didn't delete the vendor file (since I am on Rogers) and I used Desktop Manager 6 to load it, instead of AppLoader.
- CrackBerry Abuser
08-27-2010, 11:37 AM #18
- 169 Posts
I'll also be trying a complete upgrade from 4.xx when my new Bold comes in, so we'll see how it goes.
Quick question - if I'm running .822 on my current Bold, which has to go back to Rogers, but I installed it after deleting the vendor file from the Hutchinson file, would they cry foul and say I voided my warranty? Or would it just look like I upgraded using the latest official Rogers software?SRG
- CrackBerry Newbie
08-27-2010, 01:23 PM #19
- 7 Posts
I just updated to Rogers' version of 126.96.36.1992. The download of 385 modules to my PC took about 6 hours [sic], and the main visible results are
- a new background image,
- loss of data from some applications, notably Splash Shopper,
- disabling of QuickPull, and
- inability of DeskTop Manager to see the device any more
I would, to say the least, recommend that this upgrade be undertaken with caution.
- 08-27-2010, 01:25 PM #20
- 08-27-2010, 02:52 PM #21
Do not install this official release. .822 from Rogers still has the "sound profile" issue. After 3 days, I have officially lost all sounds for my ringers. I am going back to .681.
I thought all was good... but certainly not.
- CrackBerry User
08-27-2010, 06:28 PM #22
- 17 Posts
- 08-27-2010, 06:31 PM #23
- CrackBerry Abuser
08-27-2010, 06:43 PM #24
- 350 Posts
Yup, same story here. Upgraded via DM and after half a day, sound profiles are gone. Curious to know if 771 is any better than 681.
Is it even worth cracking some joke about how long this will actually take Rogers/RIM to fix/update? Didn't think so...
(oh, and re: pictures, same grainy resolution for me, but interestingly when I went to zoom on them, the clarity returned...??)
- 08-27-2010, 06:45 PM #25