- 11-21-13, 12:33 AM #151
Please forgive me if my question is ignorant. I constantly update to the newest leak with the regular auto loader. I am on the previous 10.2.1.1055 with the bugs. I have the z10 on Verizon. Do I do the same with this version just execute the auto loader or I have to play with cmd etc. Which I have no clue how to work it.
Posted via CB10
- 11-21-13, 12:34 AM #152
- 11-21-13, 01:09 AM #157
so....just doing some catching up on cfp powers
am i right in thinking that this function would allow us to load an os.signed file to JUST the "installer partion" of the flash? as long as we use the right address range??....
*PAGING HATAX OR XSACHA*[BOX]WRITE Usage
WRITE <range> <filename> [<offset>]
WRITE <start address> <filename> [<offset>]
<range> specifies the flash region to be erased.
If <start address> is specified, the length of file <filename> will be used.
<offset> specifies the data location offset from the start of file <filename>
Please type CFP alone for the definition of <range>.
The WRITE command writes data from a file to flash on a device.
The start address must be the start of a sector and the length must be a
multiple of 4 (for now). Each sector written will first be erased -- this
means that writing to the first byte of a sector will cause the sector to be
empty aside from the first byte.
Please BE CAREFUL![/BOX]
- 11-21-13, 01:46 AM #160
I have an extra z10 just needs to repair the screen, if I do that, I'll be testing some cfp functions on it lol, specifically the ones that can be fixed if error occurs
Posted via CB10
- 11-21-13, 02:59 AM #164
Did you have the issue with the previous 1055 leak?
What about group texts? Does it still send out separately when responding or does the reply stay in the group text?
- 11-21-13, 03:57 AM #171
- 11-21-13, 03:58 AM #172
Sorry to crash the party with some facts but according to MD5-sums there is no difference between this release and the previous 1055-leak
1055 "leak #1";
1055 "leak #2 aka NO BUGS";
ca5f03854492d1f94154b295a93ee5b8 *qcfm.image.com.qnx.qcfm.radio.qc8960.BB10_2_1.105 6.628508.signed
fdf8e90cacaf75fa485f0accd6376912 *qcfm.image.com.qnx.coreos.qcfm.os.qc8960.factory_ sfi.desktop.BB10_2_1.1055.628508.signed
- 11-21-13, 04:54 AM #175
I had no issues with the original leak hence no point in me attempting a test run. The new cfp file can make such a huge difference? Let's wait for the report back from the users to start coming in, let's see....
- By paul collins2 in forum BB10 Leaked/Beta OSReplies: 10Last Post: 11-30-13, 12:11 PM
- By rafise in forum BB10 Leaked/Beta OSReplies: 6Last Post: 11-26-13, 11:05 AM
- By carwacster in forum BB10 Leaked/Beta OSReplies: 12Last Post: 11-23-13, 12:50 PM
- By missing_K-W in forum General BlackBerry DiscussionReplies: 32Last Post: 11-23-13, 10:54 AM
- By BB10user07 in forum General BBM ChatReplies: 56Last Post: 11-22-13, 08:12 PM