- I believe that this is what you asked for? Does "what's been posted, stand true?"
http://forums.crackberry.com/f169/ne...41/index2.html
https://www.google.com/phone/choose?locale=en_US&s7e=
Just 3 days ago you had this to say in the comments over on DroidTalk.net (scrolls to the comments to read his whole statement.)
"I don't think that Google wanted the Nexus One, in it's current form to steal market share from the Iphone, because if they did, it would have been launched on Verizon"
So which is it you knew it was coming or you didn't?
You posted your beforehand knowledge all over this forum, but could't back it up with facts. Now that Google has announced Verizon you're back posting in the threads todays news as proof of your previous statements. All this means to me and others is that you made a lucky guess, so did the guys over at DroidTalk.net with this post.
It's funny to watch little boys pretending to be knowledgeable men.01-05-10 06:20 PMLike 0 - you are a complete id10t, where was your proof back on December 14th? So you had a lucky guess.
Just 3 days ago you had this to say in the comments over on DroidTalk.net (scrolls to the comments to read his whole statement.)
"I don't think that Google wanted the Nexus One, in it's current form to steal market share from the Iphone, because if they did, it would have been launched on Verizon"
So which is it you knew it was coming or you didn't?
You posted your beforehand knowledge all over this forum, but could't back it up with facts. Now that Google has announced Verizon you're back posting in the threads todays news as proof of your previous statements. All this means to me and others is that you made a lucky guess, so did the guys over at DroidTalk.net with this post.
It's funny to watch little boys pretending to be knowledgeable men.
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com01-05-10 06:32 PMLike 0 - I was upset that it didn't launch on vzw FIRST. I should have been more clear, but issue is that Launch carrier was tmo, who is much smaller, with higher churn, not that it wasn't coming to vzw at all. I have stood behind that. What I didn't know was what the final name would be. I only knew that vzw would get a variant of it.
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com01-05-10 06:39 PMLike 0 -
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com01-05-10 08:35 PMLike 0 -
Insider - an officer of a corporation or others who have access to private information about the corporation's operations
By definition, your own admission, and they way in which compose your posts you lead people to believe you're an insider.
I asked for proof, proof which you couldn't produce until the announcement was made today. How does asking for proof make me wrong.
As far as Nexus One variants there are a few running around, the Bravo, Passion, and Incredible to name a few. Now if one of those variants would have come to Verizon your educated guess from reading the blogs and surfing the web would have been correct. However, now you're claiming you knew all along it was the Nexus One and that you were upset it wasn't launching on Verizon first.
I was upset that it didn't launch on vzw FIRST. I should have been more clear, but issue is that Launch carrier was tmo, who is much smaller, with higher churn, not that it wasn't coming to vzw at all. I have stood behind that. What I didn't know was what the final name would be. I only knew that vzw would get a variant of it.
You can't use your word games to say one thing and take credit for completely different event.01-05-10 10:32 PMLike 0 - Well, I actually said variant, whether it is finally called the bravo/passion/dragon, etc makes no difference, so you did verify my main point, and that was that Verizon is getting a variant. However, I do know that Verizon is testing the variant. Whether you disagree, or say you "know for a fact" that they are not, is simply what you feel, or feel that you know. And that's fine, no biggie. However, I do know that Verizon is testing it.01-06-10 12:52 PMLike 0
- I just read this whole thread and only have 1 thing to say:
Brian can you change your picture....it freaks me out every time I read any of your posts.
Thanks01-06-10 01:05 PMLike 0 - Read what I have bolded. Verizon wasn't testing the Nexus One at the time you said it. People jumped to a rumor that The Unlockr made via BGR and immediately thought the Passion was coming to Verizon. In the very same pictures, the Nexus One frequencies were T-Mobile. There were no Passion period, as I said in this very thread. ERDude posted comments that you've made and now you're backpedaling. Listen Brian, I'm not with the back and forth stuff and would admit as a man when I'm in the wrong, but I wasn't. You're claiming victory over something I too have said, and you even stated I've said. Actually we are both wrong as it's not even a variant but the actual Nexus One. Though in another thread, I've also stated that Verizon and Sprint should have their own CDMA version of the Nexus One, which I've quoted as well. Anyway Brian, let's just relax and enjoy the news.
Posted from my CrackBerry at wapforums.crackberry.com01-06-10 01:24 PMLike 0
- Forum
- Other Platforms
- Android
Nexus One: T-Mobile Partners with Google
LINK TO POST COPIED TO CLIPBOARD